I will be making use of no hermeneutic, thank you really. We talk ancient greek language.

Posted on July 29, 2020

I will be making use of no hermeneutic, thank you really. We talk ancient greek language.

The passage in 1 Cor. Does NOT utilize identity-words, it utilizes action terms: “those who take, those who have drunk, people who revile, those people who have sex with men”.

None of the are terms that basically refer to one’s identification, in Greek. They refer to actions that are one’s.

Kathy, praise Jesus for the testimony and it’s also great to know which you’ve been aided here. We shall truly simply just take this into consideration whenever getting together with people connected with SF.

Nonetheless, evaluating Daniel’s reactions (re: “I speak ancient Greek — therefore there’s just exactly just what 1 Cor. 6:9-11 ‘really’ says…. As if nobody else has ever studied those verses – or lived them! ), you might additionally be able understand why i’m incredibly skeptical.

In addition, he hasn’t really addressed any of my concerns & he linked to an article about “divorce”, when my analogy was about adultery while I appreciate that Ron has engaged here.

Maybe, i ought to have drawn it down further: if a married guy nevertheless experiences other intercourse attraction toward ladies who aren’t their spouse in a way for him to identify as an adulterous Christian that he is prone to fantasize about an adulterous affair, but he seeks help to battle the temptation, would it be proper? Needless to say perhaps maybe not, unless apply the reasoning this web site right here.

I’m happy for you personally, Kathy, and would not wish to accomplish or state any such thing to discourage you. My concern could be the article writers in the web site expect you’ll be addressed as authorities mainly because an‘experience’ is had by them. Meanwhile, a lot of us who’ve been walking when you look at the light for a long time and that would never ever consider distinguishing as homosexual are now being tossed underneath the coach.

You truly appear to have no idea where I’m originating from, and you also assume i’m merely an apologist for many things gay. Either that, or perhaps you think I’m dishonest. I’m uncertain. If you’d love to realize more about where I’m originating from, please glance at my responses within the responses portion of the “What Not Reducible Means” post prior to the post on SF. We don’t protect the proposal that “people with SSA should determine as gay”. I just think we must charitably pay attention to why someone chooses to make use of a particular adjective. But i believe that both urge and sin must certanly be wholly refused.

Additionally, I’m simply puzzled by the obvious dismissal of my comments about “arsenokoitai”. I’m maybe perhaps not exercising sophistry, you may actually believe that i will be.

At the very least, Merry Christmas! Blessings on your own Noel!

It’s all a bit messy, eh?. As for myself we do not think i am utilising the word homosexual to spell it out myself in the foreseeable future since it is uncomfortable for me personally today, (way too many memories). Nonetheless, i might state i will be homosexual to let people understand we won’t be men that are dating. Wef only I really could explain more nonetheless it is xmas Eve! Enjoy your getaway, Jess, may comfort be with you and yours ??

Kathy and Daniel, i recently read your feedback right right here. Merry Christmas time to the two of you.

Ron: Why do you url to a write-up about breakup. Maybe, we had a need to draw it away further: in case a married guy nevertheless experiences opposite gender attraction toward women that aren’t their spouse in a way that he’s vulnerable to fantasize about an adulterous event, but he seeks make it possible to battle the urge, would it not be proper for him to determine being an adulterous Christian? Needless to say maybe perhaps perhaps not. But utilizing your thinking, there is absolutely nothing incorrect along with it. I guess someone ‘could’ use the expression to recognize by themselves, however it’s very not likely that they’d be arguing that it’s somehow the best thing or huge tits fucking a basic thing. Maybe somebody may wish to use this type of expression since be method to be penitent for some time also to remind them of these weakness, just like a scarlett letter. But i really hope you’ll agree totally that this type of label would likely never be regarded as good or basic by anybody when you look at the Christian church.

Jess, We have read your feedback right right here and also you run into a little aggressive. Maybe that’s not your intention, but to be truthful nearly all of what you are actually arguing is an argument that is tired those of us who will be part B have gone over numerous, often times prior to.

In addition discovered your dismissal of Daniel’s statements about I Corinthians and arsenokoitai to be odd. Just just What he’s saying is certainly not revisionist. He could be providing a precise rendering regarding the Greek.

I might also simply take problem with a few of one’s language that is theological such having one foot into the world plus one into the kingdom. Scripture says we have been transported from the dominion of Satan in to the dominion for the Son. That is a complete deal. There is absolutely no one foot when you look at the kingdom and something foot down. Any Christian is completely into the kingdom. The real question is whether we have been acting in congruence with your founded citizenship. Or if we have been wearing garments from our old citizenship.

As for I Corinthians being ontological–I hear what you’re saying. But it addittionally makes assumptions that the autumn completely obliterated what is ontological therefore being created once more is some type of presence that features no link with past existence that is human. I’m not Reformed that is even sure folk say that because they acknowledge that the image of Jesus had not been lost. Put another way, i might most likely place it more within the group of renovation regarding the pre-existing ontological suggest that was compromised although not obliterated in each being that is human.

We don’t actually want to go into the argument re: why utilizing the expressed word homosexual is certainly not ok. That’s been discussing in a number of places about this weblog among others right here can approach it whether they have the energy that is emotional. But, i shall just say that adultery is an extremely various truth than an individual that has an unchosen, painful condition that renders life very hard. Adultery is chosen. Lust is opted for. The health of being gay just isn’t. Also it does not make a difference it doesn’t change that person’s reality or cure them of their same-sex attraction if you play semantic games. I don’t usage “gay” as an identification nor do numerous at SF, but it is found by us beneficial to name our condition.

Additionally, the ex-gay motion had been misleading in its refusal to make use of your message gay, knowingly leading individuals to think that they no longer had same-sex attraction that“I’m no longer gay” meant. Making use of “gay” as a descriptor is essential if you ask me in counteracting that deception.

I suspect that as your times in homosexual relationships had been two decades ago and much more that section of this is certainly a generational space. “Gay” ended up being a lot more of an identification and marker that is political than it is currently. “Gay” isn’t the ditto as “gay. ”

But just why is it fair to state that when I’m a man whom struggles with opposing intercourse attraction to a lot of ladies who aren’t my wife that is actual my problem is relegated to a single of easy choice, yet, if some body struggles with same intercourse attraction, these are typically believed to have a disorder? For some this may seem like a standard that is double but for me it appears as though a relevant point which has blinded many.

Sorry, if I be removed aggressive, but let’s not imagine that Daniel’s so-called Greek argument about 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 was being that is n’t right back during my time too. We referred to their remark for instance of the way the “Side B” arguments here are actually absolutely absolutely absolutely nothing new beneath the sun; it is all been stated before. We don’t have my commentaries in the front of me personally, but an easy google search brought up this post containing some helpful tips in the topic: http: //six11. WordPress.com/2011/11/14/scripture-and-homosexuality-1corinthians/

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Find Me On

 Subscribe in a RSS reader

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner